Akufo-Addo, Bediatuo did not read Agyapa report – Amidu

The former Special Prosecutor, Martin Amidu, has accused President Nana Akufo-Addo of rushing to issue a response without reading the details of the Agyapa Royalties Limited corruption risk report.

Mr Amidu said the report contained serious corruption issues which the presidency failed to address but rather depended on his cover letter.

Martin Amidu turned in his resignation letter on Monday, November 16, 2020.

He cited a plethora of reasons for his resignation, key amongst them was President Akufo-Addo’s alleged interference in the discharge of his duty in relation to the corruption and anti-corruption risk assessment he did on the controversial Agyapa Royalties Transaction.

In a response to the Presidency’s response which was released by the President’s Secretary, Nana Asante Bediatuo, Mr Amidu stated that the reply “creates the embarrassing impression that neither the President who directed and instructed you to write the letter under reference nor you as his Secretary have read the full sixty—four (64) page Agyapa report to be able to understand that it contains very serious suspected corruption and corruption-related offences for which I intended to open full investigations”.

According to Mr Amidu, “If the President and you had found the time to read the full Agyapa Royalties Transaction anti-corruption assessment report you would not have relied on the conclusions and observations like lazy lawyers relying on facts and holding in a published law report in making false and frivolous character assassination attacks on my integrity for cheap political point scoring”.

He added: “I shudder to think of the impression being created to the domestic and international community that this dear country of ours, Ghana, is now being run on autopilot.

Lies and deception

Mr Amidu further accused the Presidency of attempts to throw dust in the eyes of Ghanaians.

According to him, the first paragraph of the Chief of Staff’s letter dated 17th November 2020 to him written prior to the President’s directives and instructions to Mr Bediatuo to write an official letter to him as a citizen of Ghana contradicts the second paragraph of the President’s letter to him under the signature of Mr Bediatuo.

“The Chief of Staff stated that the President ‘has accepted’ my decision to resign as Special Prosecutor. On the President’s directives and instructions, you (Mr Bediatuo) state that: “The President has taken note of your resignation per the President’s Chief of Staff’s letter to you of even date herewith (SCR/DA/96/135/01/A).” (Emphasis supplied).

“In the first place, your second paragraph written on the directives and instructions of the President which I have quoted and emphasised in the immediate preceding sentence also misrepresented the reference number of the Chief of Staff’s letter of 17th November 2020.

“Secondly while the Chief of Staff clearly states that the President had accepted my resignation your letter written on the directive of the President thereafter states that ‘he has taken note of your resignation.’ Accepting a resignation and noting a resignation are synonyms only in the unscrupulous art of spinning and public deception inconsistent with the Presidential constitutional oath of our dear Republic,” he stressed.

I never met the President on the date suggested by Mr Bediatuo

The anti-corruption campaigner also refuted suggestions by Mr Bediatuo of a meeting with President Akufo-Addo.

Mr Amidu was of the view that “truth does not forget facts and dates but lies do because lies have no integrity”.

In defending his action, he stated that further that “lies are known to be both the harbingers and symptoms of corruption, corruption behaviour, and activities”.

According to him, Mr Bediatuo had indicated that there was a meeting between him and President Akufo-Addo on 21st October 2020 but that was not the case.

“I am sorry to say without any equivocation that I never met the President on 21st October 2020 in his Office because the President was away in the Volta Region between 20th October 2020 and 22nd October 2020.

“As the Secretary to the President even if suffered from a lapse of memory, you as his Secretary ought to have realized that he could not have held any such a meeting with me when I never travelled to the Volta Region during that period.

“The sloppy propaganda consisting of deliberate and knowing falsification of facts contained in your letter written on the directions and instructions of H. E. the President is so patently banal as to be incapable of convincing reasonable men who can discern factual truth from concocted falsehood except sycophants. Like corruption such lies contain within themselves the seed of their own destruction no matter how long it takes as I have demonstrated above simply with the facts and truth on my side,” he concluded.

About the Agyapa Royalties

In the deal, 75.6% of royalties of at least 16 gold mining companies will go into Agyapa Royalties Ltd.

The company will list on the London Stock Exchange and the Ghana Stock Exchange and float 49% shares valued at $1bn.

It hopes to get investors to buy shares while Agyapa Ltd collects gold royalties from future mineral resources to pay as dividend to shareholders.

Agyapa Royalties Ltd is also incorporated in a tax haven, British channel island, Jersey, where companies don’t pay corporate tax. It means the company will enjoy considerable tax reliefs.

But a wave of red flags raised by the 22 civil society organisations and the minority in Parliament compelled the government to hasten with caution.

The voices against the deal raised concerns about potential value for money, the registration of the company in a tax haven, as well as the lack of consultation as the minority walked out on the deal on the day majority, passed it.

With the minority raising hell while the CSOs threaten legal action, the government suspended the implementation of the deal when the Special Prosecutor’s Office stepped in to probe the deal on suspicion of allegations of corruption.

Mr Amidu, in a letter dated September 10, made a formal request to parliament to provide all the information regarding the approval of the deal by the House.

This compelled the government to temporarily suspend the deal while Mr Amidu combed through the transaction and pass it through the litmus test of anti-corruption.

 

 

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You might also like